When parties claim the same symbol

In recent times, various controversies are erupting regarding the claims of different political party over the same party symbol.

• An electoral or election symbol is a standardized symbol allocated to a political party.

• They are used by the parties during their campaigning and are shown on Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), where the voter chooses the symbol and votes for the associated party.
• The symbol of a party is one of extreme relevance to political survival.
• For many Indian voters who do not read, the symbol is their association with the party when they exercise their franchise. Hence, importance is given to the symbol of the party.

Election Commission’s powers in a dispute over the election symbol when a party splits:

• The Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 empowers the EC to recognize political parties and allot symbols.

• EC can decide disputes among rival groups or sections of a recognized political party staking claim to its name and symbol.
• The EC is the only authority to decide issues on a dispute or a merger under the order.
• This applies to disputes in recognized national and state parties. However, if any of the parties is not satisfied then they can approach the courts.

• Where the party is either vertically divided or it is not possible to say with certainty which group has a majority, the EC may freeze the party’s symbol and allow the groups to register themselves with new names or add prefixes or suffixes to the party’s existing names.
• The EC may take time to gather enough material to decide the question.
• For immediate electoral purposes, it may freeze the party’s symbol and advise the groups to fight the elections with different names and on temporary symbols.

Position of Judiciary on the Issue:

• Many of the cases of the split in political parties have landed in the Supreme Court. The most significant case was that of the Indian National Congress (INC) in 1969 where the Supreme Court upheld the order of the ECI applying the test of majority (Sadiq Ali vs ECI, 1972).

• It was a milestone judgment for the Election Commission as the apex court upheld the constitutional validity of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, giving an executive order the status of subordinate legislation.
• SC stated that ‘The Commission, in resolving this dispute, does not decide as to which group represents the party, but which group is that party.
• The Supreme Court has, time and again, upheld the test of majority in the Symbols Order to be a “valuable and relevant test” to decide a dispute between rival groups within a “democratic organization” like a recognized political party.

• When there is no certainty of majority in either of the party:

• • Where the party is either vertically divided or it is not possible to say with certainty which group has a majority, the EC may freeze the party’s symbol and allow the groups to register themselves with new names or add prefixes or suffixes to the party’s existing names.
  • For immediate electoral purposes, it may freeze the party’s symbol and advise the groups to fight the elections with different names and on temporary symbols.
• When rival factions are reunited in the future:

• • If reunited, the claimants may approach the EC again and seek to be recognized as a unified party.
  • The EC is also empowered to recognize mergers of groups into one entity. It may restore the symbol and name of the original party.